<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet VoIP comes under Govt. Scrutiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/</link>
	<description>A Japanese Amerasian, Former US Marine, Returned Peace Corps Volunteer, Entrepreneur, IT Consultant, Weightlifter, and Linux Tech Blogger residing in Ho Chi Minh City (Saigon), Vietnam. Tenobliss.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Miller, Jr.'s, SaigonNezumi.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vietnamese Government Responsible for Cable Theft?</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-10430</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Miller, Jr.'s, SaigonNezumi.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vietnamese Government Responsible for Cable Theft?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-10430</guid>
		<description>[...] Internet VoIP comes under Government Scrutiny [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet VoIP comes under Government Scrutiny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9566</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9566</guid>
		<description>This sort of thing is why the economy and the government of Vietnam are so fscked up. :( 

In the future everything will be VOIP to VOIP. Especially as more of the mobile phones begin to do IP and send the voice data over the IP. I don&#039;t see how they can tell whether a call is VOIP to VOIP anyway. They have no idea how I am terminating the call on my end. If you dial my phone number from a VOIP phone connected to my server in the US from VN it looks like you are dialing a standard PSTN number (and you are) but I terminate it to my VOIP phone and it never goes over the PSTN. So I don&#039;t see how this is in any way technically enforceable. Of course, that has never stopped the government there from enforcing whatever they want in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of thing is why the economy and the government of Vietnam are so fscked up. <img src='http://www.saigonnezumi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>In the future everything will be VOIP to VOIP. Especially as more of the mobile phones begin to do IP and send the voice data over the IP. I don&#8217;t see how they can tell whether a call is VOIP to VOIP anyway. They have no idea how I am terminating the call on my end. If you dial my phone number from a VOIP phone connected to my server in the US from VN it looks like you are dialing a standard PSTN number (and you are) but I terminate it to my VOIP phone and it never goes over the PSTN. So I don&#8217;t see how this is in any way technically enforceable. Of course, that has never stopped the government there from enforcing whatever they want in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Miller, Jr.'s, SaigonNezumi.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Fiber-optic Cable Looted</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Miller, Jr.'s, SaigonNezumi.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Fiber-optic Cable Looted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 07:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>[...] SAIGON LINUX GROUP     &#171; Internet VoIP comes under Govt. Scrutiny [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SAIGON LINUX GROUP     &laquo; Internet VoIP comes under Govt. Scrutiny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevmille</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9539</link>
		<dc:creator>kevmille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9539</guid>
		<description>I forgot how many telecom licenses were given out, not many.  New start ups decided to &#039;borrow&#039; another company&#039;s telecom license until they can get their own.  Normally takes 5 years I think.  My friend wanted to set a telecom up, found a partner in Vietnam but then lost his partner in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot how many telecom licenses were given out, not many.  New start ups decided to &#8216;borrow&#8217; another company&#8217;s telecom license until they can get their own.  Normally takes 5 years I think.  My friend wanted to set a telecom up, found a partner in Vietnam but then lost his partner in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Cadeo</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9525</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Cadeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 01:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9525</guid>
		<description>Makes sense... so would the opportunity to be for a company to give a rev share to the goverment for a exclusive VOIP license? From what I last heard, Skype was huge in VT so if you are a small player, this could be away to compete against the large players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense&#8230; so would the opportunity to be for a company to give a rev share to the goverment for a exclusive VOIP license? From what I last heard, Skype was huge in VT so if you are a small player, this could be away to compete against the large players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevmille</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9493</link>
		<dc:creator>kevmille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9493</guid>
		<description>Money, that&#039;s why :-)  A friend with another VOIP company told me that the government wants to strictly regulate this market b/c of the profit potential.  

VOIP to VOIP are normally free services.  VOIP to POTS involves money/fees.  Money, money, money :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money, that&#8217;s why <img src='http://www.saigonnezumi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   A friend with another VOIP company told me that the government wants to strictly regulate this market b/c of the profit potential.  </p>
<p>VOIP to VOIP are normally free services.  VOIP to POTS involves money/fees.  Money, money, money <img src='http://www.saigonnezumi.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Cadeo</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2007/05/23/internet-voip-comes-under-govt-scrutiny/comment-page-1/#comment-9472</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Cadeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://saigonnezumi.com/?p=340#comment-9472</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Thanks for the head&#039;s up. It is kind of odd to see that there is a distinction between a VOIP to a POTS and a VOIP to VOIP call. Any thoughts on why? Is it due to the loss of tax revenue that is assesed when someone uses skype to call a landline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Thanks for the head&#8217;s up. It is kind of odd to see that there is a distinction between a VOIP to a POTS and a VOIP to VOIP call. Any thoughts on why? Is it due to the loss of tax revenue that is assesed when someone uses skype to call a landline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
