<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Boom Faces Gov&#8217;t Blockages (Helen Clark &#8211; IPS News)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2008/12/22/blogging-boom-faces-govt-blockages-helen-clark-ips-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2008/12/22/blogging-boom-faces-govt-blockages-helen-clark-ips-news/</link>
	<description>Insider&#039;s Perspective of Saigon, Vietnam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaigonNezumi (Kevin)</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2008/12/22/blogging-boom-faces-govt-blockages-helen-clark-ips-news/comment-page-1/#comment-32618</link>
		<dc:creator>SaigonNezumi (Kevin)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 07:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saigonnezumi.com/?p=1352#comment-32618</guid>
		<description>@Peter: I think this is the confusion.  Several web hosting companies are owned by the ISPs here but not all of them.  The web hosting companies, from my understanding, we the one responsible.  The error is assuming only ISPs can control this.

If this is the case, then the ISP that has less restrictions on it&#039;s users will gain more subscribers.  I can see Viettel, controlled by the military, gaining the market if ISPs are asked to control blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: I think this is the confusion.  Several web hosting companies are owned by the ISPs here but not all of them.  The web hosting companies, from my understanding, we the one responsible.  The error is assuming only ISPs can control this.</p>
<p>If this is the case, then the ISP that has less restrictions on it&#8217;s users will gain more subscribers.  I can see Viettel, controlled by the military, gaining the market if ISPs are asked to control blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.saigonnezumi.com/2008/12/22/blogging-boom-faces-govt-blockages-helen-clark-ips-news/comment-page-1/#comment-32617</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saigonnezumi.com/?p=1352#comment-32617</guid>
		<description>My understanding of the article is that ISPs will held responsible for blog content. This would be something to be concerned about, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the article is that ISPs will held responsible for blog content. This would be something to be concerned about, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

